For banks · funds · fintechs

Frontier AI on the money. None of it leaves the vault.

You sit on the richest data on earth — PII, positions, live signals — and you run yesterday's models on masked scraps, because you can't hand it to a hyperscaler that could leak it or get subpoenaed. Noolog runs frontier inference inside your jurisdiction — and mints the regulator's audit trail as a byproduct.

0 bytes egress 1 immutable trail per deliberation Jurisdiction-pinned · on-prem MPC vaults for shared secrets

The trap

The best data in finance is under lock — from the best models.

Every path to a frontier model runs through someone else's cloud. So the answer is always no.

Data residency It legally can't leave

MiFID/GDPR/MAS pin data to a region. Ship it to a US endpoint — you've already breached.

Model-risk governance A black box you can't supervise

FCA/FINRA and the EU AI Act demand oversight and a trace. A closed API gives neither.

Leak & subpoena Their breach is your headline

On a third party, PII plus signals can leak, train someone's model, or be subpoenaed.

So finance runs AI with the handbrake on — masked scraps, stale models, a paper trail stitched together after the fact.

The turn

Bring the model to the data. Keep the vault sealed.

A sovereign on-prem node runs frontier-class deliberation on live data that never crosses your boundary. Compliance isn't assembled afterwards — it falls out of how the node runs.

01
Sovereign node, zero egress

Frontier inference on real data, on hardware in your jurisdiction. Nothing masked, nothing shipped. Air-gap option for the paranoid desk.

02
Audit trail by construction

Every deliberation is an immutable, attributed ledger — oversight, convergence, dissent and kill-switch baked in. Not documentation. Evidence.

03
Jurisdiction-pinned & MPC-vaulted

Boundaries pinned to verified regions. Shared secrets — signing keys, weights — split across MPC vaults, so no single box holds the whole. On sealed hardware.

04
Maps straight onto the rules

The same running system answers EU AI Act, FCA, FINRA, MAS and GDPR — each requirement a property of the protocol, not a slide. Full mapping →

How it holds

The vault reasons. The ledger reports. Only signed hashes cross the wall.

Raw data loops inside the boundary — the model reasons over it and back, never out. The only thing that leaves is an append-only, signed audit ribbon to the regulator.

Jurisdiction boundary — raw data loops inside Frontier node — on-prem inference Audit ledger — the only thing that crosses

Each event is a signed AuditEnvelope on a hash chain — the same chain_head rides every message. Tamper-evident by construction; the regulator gets an interface, not a copy of your data.

EU AI Act FCA SM&CR FINRA MAS AIRM GDPR Art. 22 SOC2 Full mapping →

Down to the interface

Even the UI is auditable.

The whole Noolog frontend is open-source Slint — statically typed, compiled to native Rust/C++, no GC runtime, deterministic, with GUI test automation. Source-available and built to the bar that certifies safety-critical UIs — the same "prove it, don't assert it" discipline as the audit trail, out to the pixels.

IEC 62304 ISO 26262 DO-178C IEC 61508

Not every standard binds every deployment — but the interface is built to that bar. Full mapping →

Feed the best models your best data. Legally.

Stop running finance on masked scraps. Put a sovereign node on your floor — compliance writes itself.